Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 42”x31.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 42”x31.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 42”x31.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 42”x31.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 42”x31.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 32”x24”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 32”x24”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 32”x24”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 32”x24”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 32”x24”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 18”x13.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 18”x13.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 18”x13.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 18”x13.5”

Duality . 2012 . Untitled

3/3 Editions + 1 AP . Archival Pigment Print . 18”x13.5”

Foreword

A Choreography of Elusive Possibilities:
Shibu Arakkal’s Duality Series

Shibu Arakkal’s recent suite of black and white photographs, Duality, transports us into a space of reflection that has been located at a remove from the fragmenting distractions of everyday life. The deliberate aesthetic of renunciation that the artist has embraced, with his refusal of the seductions of colour, is equally evident in his choice of ostensible subjects to represent. His primary visual materials are spare, elegant and elemental: the sky, the patterns that clouds make as they transit across the sky; the sport of light, object and shadow; the thick stone or brick walls of houses that have weathered the vagaries of several centuries; windows, sometimes arched and recessed, and sometimes shuttered and set high on a wall, as though to deny the summer wind ingress into inner courtyards while allowing those within to savour a vista of hills, valleys and thickets – and perhaps also to anticipate the incursions of potential raiders.

To describe these photographs as black and white is, of course, to do an injustice to the complex arpeggio of greys that unfold across Arakkal’s frames. And I have not yet mentioned the key gesture that the artist adopts in Duality: the decisive vertical divider that cleaves every photograph into two halves that appear to mirror yet contest one another, these equal sections seeming paradoxically to race away as well as rush towards one another.

By enacting a simultaneous scission and twinning, Arakkal’s gesture introduces an explosive, enigmatic energy into his images. As these frames break and gather themselves into halves, epiphanies occur. The rippling water of a lake or river shimmers with an uncontainable excess that would surely brim over its banks. A row of trees join together in a low, rustling, sparking thrum, as though they had been translated into a harp for the wayward wind to play on. And a house, mirroring yet defying its own monumentality as the pictorial logic cuts and rejoins it, strikes out at the viewer like the jutting prow of an ocean liner.

The operative relationship between the halves of each image in the Duality series is neither a simple mirroring nor a dramatic variance. Instead, it articu- lates a fluid and unpredictable engagement, a choreography of elusive possibilities. With this gesture, the artist liberates his images from the burden of representation and celebrates them as oneiric occasions: dreams that provoke the faculty of interpretation and invite the play of an intelligence that is at once sensuous and speculative.

Indeed, Arakkal’s pictorial inventions remind us that the mirror image is never an exact equivalent of the object it mirrors. Rather, it always generates an excess of sensation and affect. The reflection always communicates itself, in the first place, as a shock, because it reveals what the object can never see or know for itself. This originary shock continues to radiate from the mirror image as it forces the object to reconsider itself (or obliges us to reconsider the object) by contrast with itself. By setting itself up as the beguiling riddle of the not-quite or the non-identical twin, the mirror image challenges us to decide which of the two images is shadow and which is substance. That distinction is itself dissolved, as we enter a domain of after-images without a sin- gular original.

All the photographs that comprise the visual substratum of the Duality suite have been shot in the mediaeval village of Belforte del Chienti in the eastern Italian province of Macerata. The village, which takes the historic Palazzo Bonfranceschi as its focal point, is home to Terra dell’Arte, an independent arts organization that hosts an international artist residency, which Arakkal held in 2012. But Duality does not propose a description of the place, to anchor the particularity of its placeness in a record of detail. At the same time, it steers programmatically clear of the generic temptations of the pastoral, the ro- mantic or the picturesque.

Instead of presenting us with the fraught, moody, sumptuous account of an architecture and a landscape cradled within a nameless eternity of summer or autumn, the artist generates a compelling and productive instability, one that plunges us into a condition of reverie. As we take bracing pleasure in Arakkal’s photographic departures, we are reminded strongly of the philosopher Gaston Bachelard’s suggestion that “

‘Imagination is the faculty of deforming images offered by perception, of freeing ourselves from the immediate images; it is especially the faculty of changing images.’ (1)

In the process of transforming the stimuli of his experience into this sequence of mysterious images, Arakkal performs a quintessentially abstractionist manoeuvre, and achieves a more profound encounter with place than might have been possible by the meticulous rendering of an optical truth. Austere as Arakkal’s choices may be, they bring his art to fruition precisely because they maintain a continuous relay with his appetite for sensuous experience: his desire to commemorate a moment of deep seeing, culled from the flux of time, the texture and palpability of rock, shade, shrub, or streetlamp. The thing becomes its own name, and stands in no further need of topographical or cultural location; such annotations may come afterwards, in a reflection such as the present essay that is intended to amplify the viewer’s resources of understanding, but it is not a prerequisite for the viewer who comes with no prior preparation to the record of illuminations that forms the Duality suite.

As my eyes travel across Arakkal’s images, the visual prompts a memory of the lyric: I am reminded of the poetic cadences of Giuseppe Ungaretti, who was born to a diasporic Italian family in Alexandria and was seized, always, by the deep melancholia and beauty of his ancestral homeland. In a poem composed early in 1917, ‘Pleasure’, Ungaretti wrote, in words that might apply just as appropriately to Shibu Arakkal’s experience as an artist:

‘I burn with the
fever
of this spate of light

I welcome this
day like
a sweetening fruit

Tonight
I shall feel
remorse like a
howl
lost in the
desert’ (2)

References

1. Gaston Bachelard, L’invitation au voyage, from L’air et les songes, anthologised in On Poetic Imagination and Reverie: Selections from the Works of Gaston
Bachelard (Colette Gaudin trans.; Indianapolis/ New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971), p. 19.

2. Giuseppe Ungaretti, ‘Pleasure’, in Giuseppe Ungaretti: Selected Poems (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971), p. 55.

Ranjit Hoskote
Contemporary Indian Poet . Art Critic . Cultural Theorist . Independent Curator
Mumbai . India . 2012

Foreword

. . .

Introduction

Entering into contact with an ambience, until yesterday unknown, trying to represent its essence is not an easy act.

The skill and confidence with the technical medium can help, but that may not be sufficient. In this case, the result could be a set of evocative images, but something could still be lacking.

So here it is that the creative act takes the upper hand over technique by subjecting it to suit your needs. The mirror, has always been the subject of philosophical and psychoanalytic deepening, as an instrument. The specular expression formed from a reality and from its opposite, with their coexistence in the same context, in the same image, represents the manifestation of a creative act that does not stop at the surface of things, but tries to live them.

Two opposites which mate with one another, that look at each other and which together generates a new “whole”, different than the pure sum of the subject and of its opposite. It is not a technical artifice.

It is a new reality. A reality in which are united two sides of the same coin. It’s like a two-faced Janus in search of his own identity.

Windows and trees. Nature and creation of man. Negative and positive. Duality and non duality. Because, after the fusion, one cannot exist without the other. Because the whole does not provide for separation between the two parts of a single subject. Because it’s easy to miss the reference and it becomes difficult to separate the old from the new, good from evil, the just from the unjust.

As well as life, photography in reality is never in black and white. It is in endless shades of grey.

New forms come to life and manifest themselves in these artworks of Shibu Arakkal. Forms that even for those who live in direct contact with could be hard to recognize.

Make an effort to see with different eyes than what one has on hand constitutes a mature approach that certainly generates a step forward in the knowledge of themselves and of what surrounds us.

Shibu Arakkal in interpreting, in the broadest and correct sense, his artistic residence in Belforte del Chienti as a unique opportunity has given body and feeling to everything with which he entered into contact. The result of this work is an intense and creative route of which this exposure, rich in suggestions and reflections, is only the first manifestation.

Alfonso Caputo
Artist . Curator . Terra dell'Arte President . MIDAC Museum Director
Belforte del Chienti . Italy . 2012

Introduction

. . .

Artist’s Note

Every moment could have been different if only. But the moments that are, piece together to become our lives. Our conscious mind swings between either and or in deciding the details of our daily lives and as such, somethings are callously decided on and others over much pondering. Either ways, there seem to always be two ways to divvy up almost everything. The Yin and Yang philosophy is presumably a convenient way to simplify our emotional clutter.

However, one reflects the other like every emotion in life and so what becomes apposite is which is the question and which the answer. In as much, we almost forget that there is such a thing as complimentary opposites.

It is also interesting to challenge common notions as ‘seeing is believing’ despite the fact that our physical sight isn’t designed to comprehend everything. It like all our other senses is only conditioned to our common lives. An instance when the earth becomes the sky is a mirage that might question one’s intelligence.

The lines and curves of every design, our visual perspective and the different emotions of light create the sights we see. In the interpretation of what we see, visually and in the subjective acceptance of it lies our personal contexts. There in also lies questions to the levels of our personal wisdom in the wholesome or partial acceptance of everything we experience, even visually, although true wisdom would dictate that there is only one kind of acceptance, the wholesome kind.

Life may always be a matter of the glass half full or half empty and our separate view of such things might also guide us to our very own destinies.

Shibu Arakkal
Belforte del Chienti . Italy . 2012

Artist’s Note

. . .